Jump to content

KnightTime007

(Non-dues paying)
  • Posts

    48
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never

Posts posted by KnightTime007

  1. Congrats Lloyd, I couldn't think of a better choice, if fact, somehow I thought you already were a moderator. You and a few others on FGMCC have saved me hundreds of $'s in advice and avoided mistakes. Hooray, finally, a forum where I can give back instead of taking all the time!

     

    ------------------

    KTMC72PS1.jpg

    Charlie

    72 Monte - Mohave Gold Paint - Lt Tan Vinyl Top - Dark Sandelwood Int - 350/350 - Quadrajet, 12 bolt rear - 181,000 Miles on original engine and tranny.

  2. Wow Steve, thanks for the information. You really got to be a part of the birth of our FGMC (maybe even the exact car one of us runs today). It must feel great to see people so passionate about something you had a hand in building over 30 years ago. Again, this site and you people rock!

     

     

    [This message has been edited by KnightTime007 (edited 01-23-2003).]

  3. Do you ever use your defroster/defogger? If so, replacing the heater core is a worthy cause. A new Delco core cost me $54. I replaced mine about two weeks ago and it took me about a 2 hours to do. If you have A/C, (here in Florida it's a State law, you must have A/C, LOL) you may want to consider replacing the evaporator if it is original while you have it all apart.

     

     

     

    ------------------

    KTMC72PS1.jpg

    Charlie

    Pensacola, Florida

    72 Monte, 2nd (and last) Owner

  4. I don't know about all the color combinations, but my interior is totally original "Sandlewood" (Medium Tan color) and the steering wheel is black. I also remember two original interiors of friends Monte's back in the late 70's, (Green and Blue) and both steering wheels were also black (with woodgrain centerpiece of course). So that makes 3 confirmed original different interiors colors all had black steering wheels. Hope that helps a little.

    Charlie

     

    ------------------

    KTMC72PS1.jpg KnightTime007

    Pensacola, Florida

    72 Monte original 1 owner

  5. Posting links-only is common practice on large boards, images do consume too much bandwidth for dialup connections. Personally, I kind of like seeing a picture in the message, as I liken it to putting a face to a name. But hey, I'm just weird like that!

     

    Charlie

  6. No offense taken Canuck. It takes a WHOLE lot to offend me! I totally agree that any web page should not have to be horizontally scrolled to be viewed. The only way to assure that won't happen is to limit all page development to 640x480. Most people run their screen resolution at 800x600, although 1024x768 is becoming more of the standard in developers coding. I've resized my image to hopefully not cause anymore horizontal scrolling. If it does still cause any problem, please let me know. I think Andreas has a great idea too ... only use a signature once per thread. Now that I have deviated from the discussion of Monte's toward computer stuff (too much like my 9-5 duties!), I'll try to return to why I started visiting FGMCC, Monte Talk! Not to say I don't mind throwing in my two cents about computer stuff as they do provide quite a nice living for my family...

     

    Thanks all,

    Charlie

  7. Yes, the images in a Signature must be stored on a server external to FGMC. You are correct, a thumbnail is a just a reduction in the dimensions (height and width) of a larger image, resulting in an image of smaller file size. The file size of an image can also be reduced without altering the dimensions of the image. This method reduces the number of colors contained in the image. Dimensionally larger images can retain their visual size, and still be reduced in file size. There is a sacrafice of clarity when reducing colors depth as overdoing it results in a grainy and somewhat fuzzy appearance. Originally, the picture of my Monte is 289kb, but by reduction of resolution (colors), I have compressed it to 17kb.

    Charlie

     

    ------------------

    KTMC72PS1.jpg KnightTime007

    Pensacola, Florida

    72 Monte original 1 owner

  8. If your goal is to reduce load times for pages and reduce bandwidth usage, then limiting image size in kb (kilobytes) would definetly be the more prudent target. Pixel dimensions are an indication of image size(viewable dimensions), but the file size still can vary greatly depending on the resolution of the image (color depth). A reduction in bandwidth consumption, and therfore faster page load times for dialup users, would be better accomplished by limiting filesize (kb). Also, JPG filetypes (files that end in a JPG extension are usually the smaller image types (vs. BMP or most other formats).

    Just my two cents worth, I'm certainly not trying to set any board policy here!

    Charlie

     

    ------------------

    KTMC72PS1.jpg KnightTime007

    Pensacola, Florida

    72 Monte original 1 owner

  9. Quote:
    <font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by Pete_72_Monte:
    I have this posted in the Comments/Suggestions area, but I know everyone does not visit that area, so here it is in this section also. smile.gif

    Hi everyone, I need to address the issue about the size of signature pictures. We are getting some really big pictures in them lately, and that is not all to fair to our members who use slower connections, plus it uses up bandwidth. So we would like to make a size limit on signature pictures of 250x175 pixels.
    Pictures that are a part of a posting is another situation because most of the time those are used to show detail on a specific subject. So basically those are exempt, but please dont have them obnoxiously huge.

    We do hope that everyone understands why we are requesting this, we want to make Http://www.firstgenmc.com a pleasure for everyone to enjoy.

    Thank You,
    Pete

    </font>


    Also here is a photo of my Monte reduced to 18kb in size

    ------------------
    KTMC72PS1.jpg KnightTime007
    Pensacola, Florida
    72 Monte original 1 owner
  10. Pete, How about if the image is reduced in size to 17kb regardless of pixel size? Computer Graphics was my job for a few years and I can manipulate an image to look quite good and still keep it at less than 25 kb. Most images of the pixel resoultion you stated are at least 25kb in size. If not, I understand, just thought I'd ask since the issue is bandwidth, not resolution.

     

    Also, No need for apologies for the flame war Pixtar has started in the Engine discussion thread. I know how that goes, I run several message boards myself. Many thanks for all the help and info I have received here so far. I will be definetly be joining next paycheck.

    Charlie

×
×
  • Create New...