Jump to content

Fundamental Design Flaw on My 71


Andy's Auto

Recommended Posts

Ever wonder why my 71 never really ran better than 12.0 even with a built 496, Merlins, gears and a really good convertor? Turns out I failed to do my homework. My pistons were at .030 deck and were dished 19cc. With a 118cc head and an .054 compressed head gasket, it gave me a static compression ratio of 8.2:1.

 

God I wished I sprayed the snot out of this thing before I balloned the old convertor killing the thrust main.

 

Monte Carlo 2.2 coming as soon as I get the Muncie in the 68. In progress.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Homework? It sounds as if you forgot to turn on the shop lights!

That's the stuff you should be able to see with your eyeballs.

 

You can correct some of that error with steel shim head gaskets. (.020 compressed instead of the .054). That's almost as good as moving your piston to zero deck.

I question the dished piston. A dished piston isn't all that common. Are you sure you are reading the numbers right? A piston with a raised dome of about .2 tall will be listed to have a "piston head volume" of -18.3 cc. The number is given as a negative because that's how it fits in the compression math formula. That number is subtracted from the chamber volume...I guess they think it's handy to have the minus sign in there already, but it can be a little confusing.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...