Jump to content

Motor Mount change ? Snowball


snomobeelr

Recommended Posts

Don't mean to pile up the threads. changing headers may need to change Motor mount.  BBC . My drivers side header was a bit close to the proportioning valve. I knew there was a little movement . But after pulling the header out , and as Tom suggested in another thread I may need to change my motor mount. I think least the drivers side Motor Mount and better off doing it while headers are out .  Unfortunately Im not going to go with the "Chris Alston chassis works" . I know the debate over the Poly and the rubbers far as vibration. I just want to make this as easy as possible and use the existing frame mount. I am leaning towards the Lakewood 24087 or the Energy Suspension. Does anyone know which  Energy Suspension I should get is it the "Tall and Narrow - 31117G?.  Or any other sugjestions?  Its  been a long time. I can do one side at a time right?    Thanks everyone. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did not suggest the Chris Alston mounts to raise the engine for header clearance. The height is standard. I suggested them because anyone with an engine with alot of HP and torque will eventually destroy a stock or poly stock style mount. A solid mount vibrates everything including your teeth. Lol. The Alston mounts, the way they are designed are the best style of both worlds. The strength of a solid mount and the non vibration of a stock mount. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tom I wish I had seen those when I was putting the car together for exactly the reason your saying,  one and done. I really just don't want to change the frame mounts at this stage. Not to mention it will prove my wife to be right. Again .  😬

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just to be clear, and as Tom mentioned.........going back to the header thread. I did not intend to suggest mounts would fix header clearance. I just posted what I had done with my ARH install and my build. 

I probably would have gone with the Alston mounts if I knew about them back then, but its good info to know now lol 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand and agree with not wanting to do the mounts I suggested. I only stumbled across them while looking for a better mount, dare I say, unbreakable when I was going to install the engine into my Monte. After many years of breaking stock mounts, Lakewood mounts and solid mounts, yes broke them also I was looking for what I found, so far, in the Alston engine mounts. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks guys , I know the mounts won't fix the header clearance. I was thinking since I have the headers off maybe swap the mount.  The build has 7000 miles on it and they are stock type engine mounts with rubber. 7000 isn't much but I do hammer on her a lot. Figured it might help tighten it up the movement a little, maybe.  So If I do go poly on the engine mount do I  have to go poly on the trans too?  

Thanks again, I do appreciate it. 

Alan

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Someone here, or someplace else I value an opinion/knowledge told me to replace the trans mount when I went with the poly motor mounts. So I will say yes.

As far as the "vibration" comments I heard and read that also, but I have no complaints. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another dumb question.  Im just changing the driver side engine Side mount.  Where should I jack up the engine from ?  at the balancer? Or too much stress on crank. I would think if I jacked it up with pice of wood from the bottom flat part of oil pan I would crush it? Am I overthinking it ?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So I may have an issue. The original Motor mount is 2 1/2 wide and the Energy suspension is 31117G is 2 3/8 wide.   I think the other energy suspension "3.1114G" is shorter and its 2 5/8 wide. So too much correct, and it is shorter?

 

 

Energy motor mount.jpg

original motor mount.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

So I ordered the short wide "Energy Suspension 3.1114G"  but it was too wide and 1/4 or more shorter. I may have been able to place a washer in the mount but didn't want to do that. I ended up replacing it with the "Lakewood 24087 "Motor Mount.  The car originally had a 350 and I never changed the Frame mounts.  The lakewood are 3.5 wide and the only ones that seemed fit the frame mount correctly.  There was some play in the old mount so Ill have to watch it in the future.   

short wide 3.jpg

short wide 2.jpg

mm short wide 1.jpg

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...